Anti-hunger experts say ending the Household Food Security Report will make it difficult to track the impact of tariffs and cuts to food assistance.

Anti-hunger experts say ending the Household Food Security Report will make it difficult to track the impact of tariffs and cuts to food assistance.
September 22, 2025
September 22, 2025 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) will stop publishing a report on food insecurity that anti-hunger groups say is a gold standard in understanding hunger nationwide.
Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.
Already a member?
Login
The agency confirmed reports this weekend that it will cease future Household Food Security Reports, calling it “redundant, costly [and] politicized.” In fact, the USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS), compiles the report by collating preexisting data. That data comes from hunger-specific questions that are already part of the annual census.
Anti-hunger groups rebuked the decision and urged the agency to reverse course.
Eric Mitchell, president of the Alliance to End Hunger, said the survey has served as a test on how well national policies and programs are working to lessen food insecurity, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
“With continuing worries about food inflation, as well as significant cuts to America’s largest food assistance program–SNAP–this move is a blow to policymakers and advocates who rely on the data to improve the lives of our food insecure neighbors,” Mitchell said in an email.
Gina Plata-Nino, interim SNAP director at the Food, Research and Action Center (FRAC), called the timing of the announcement “suspect,” given rising concern about the impact of tariffs on grocery prices and the passage of Republicans’ One Big Beautiful Bill. The massive budget bill included historic cuts to SNAP funding and is projected to cut benefits for nearly 3 million Americans.
“This just seems to be in line with an administration that doesn’t allow data to show how their bad policies of cutting people off services, increasing tariffs, and making it more difficult to buy food will impact them,” Plata-Nino said.
While there are other federal reports that evaluate hunger, none have the same specificity and objectivity as the Household Food Security Report, Plata-Nino said. It asks more detailed questions that help analysts understand how other environmental factors, policy shifts, or major events at the time may have caused a person to experience food insecurity.
For example, the report allows analysts to see how the Great Recession led to spikes in food insecurity and how the influx of government assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic prevented these spikes.
“This data … is a one of a kind data source,” said Joseph Llobrera, director of food assistance at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
While the report began in 1995 under the Clinton administration, Llobrera noted it stemmed from a Reagan administration task force on food assistance, which found at the time no concrete way of measuring hunger.
The survey model has been incorporated into other federal surveys on hunger, like the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Both ask questions about food insecurity, but the NHANES data comes in a two-year cycle, and the sample is not large enough for demographic or state level analyses, Llobrera said.
The USDA report, however, provides information on an annual basis and uses a large enough sample size that analysts can better understand food insecurity at the national and state level, he continued. It also includes some demographic breakdowns to better understand what puts individuals more at risk of food insecurity.
“We need to measure what we care about, and if we care about people getting enough to eat … then there’s no other data collection mechanism and report that will help us gauge the best now and into the future,” Llobrera said. (Link to this post.)
This story has been updated to more accurately reflect the timing of NHIS and NHANES data reporting.
September 24, 2025
In a recent paper, University of Iowa professor Silvia Secchi finds that the current Census of Agriculture is neither complete nor accurate, and could skew federal research and investment.
January 20, 2025
September 23, 2025
September 22, 2025
September 17, 2025
September 18, 2025
September 18, 2025
September 17, 2025
Like the story?
Join the conversation.