EPA Will Keep Rule Designating PFAS as ‘Hazardous’ | Civil Eats
the epa headquarters in washington, dc, with the civil eats food policy tracker logo superimposed over it

EPA Will Keep Rule Designating PFAS as ‘Hazardous’

Experts say the decision will place responsibility on the chemical industry for cleanup, not farmers.

September 23, 2025 – Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin announced last week that the agency will keep in place a Biden-era policy change that enables the agency to make companies pay for the cleanup of harmful “forever chemicals.”

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, are chemicals that can persist in the environment for centuries, accumulate in the human body, and are associated with a range of health harms.

“EPA’s reaffirmation of this rule is a win for environmental justice, giving communities poisoned without their knowledge a long-overdue path to relief,” Melanie Benesh, vice president of government affairs at the Environmental Working Group (EWG), said in a statement.

In April 2024, Biden’s EPA designated the two forever chemicals associated with the most harm and widespread environmental contamination—perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)—as “hazardous substances” under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the country’s “Superfund” law. That meant the agency could then prioritize the cleanup of sites contaminated with those chemicals and hold companies responsible for the remediation.

Since then, agricultural industry groups, including the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association,  National Pork Producers Council, and American Farm Bureau Federation, have challenged the rule in court, arguing that farmers who spread contaminated fertilizer on their land could be on the hook for the cleanup costs.

banner showing a radar tracking screen and the words

Last week, a broader coalition of farm groups, among them the National Farmers Union, National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, and American Farmland Trust, released federal policy recommendations for addressing PFAS contamination on farms. In addition to provisions related to assisting farmers with cleanup and the reduction of future contamination, the groups included a section recommending the EPA further clarify and confirm that farmers will not be held responsible for contamination caused by fertilizers.

Zeldin put that issue—referred to as “passive receiver liability”— front and center in the EPA’s Sept. 17 announcement. “When it comes to PFOA and PFOS contamination, holding polluters accountable while providing certainty for passive receivers that did not manufacture or generate those chemicals continues to be an ongoing challenge,” he said. “EPA intends to do what we can based on our existing authority, but we will need new statutory language from Congress to fully address our concerns.”

But some experts say those concerns have already been addressed.

“The 2024 enforcement discretion policy resolved the situation, clarifying that EPA would focus enforcement only on polluters—not farmers and municipalities that received PFAS chemicals,” said Betsy Southerland, the former director of the EPA’s Office of Science and Technology in the Office of Water, in a statement released by the Environmental Protection Network.

Southerland welcomed the announcement that the EPA will keep the designations in place. She also warned it will offer little relief to people worried about forever chemicals in drinking water, because of Zeldin’s earlier decision to roll back limits on four other PFAS. The EPA also recently approved four new pesticides that qualify as PFAS based on an internationally recognized definition the EPA does not use.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

“Let’s be clear,” Southerland said. “Our drinking water is still at risk because Trump’s EPA is recklessly allowing more toxic chemicals in Americans’ drinking water.” (Link to this post.)

You’d be a great Civil Eats member…

Civil Eats is a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, and we count on our members to keep producing our award-winning work.

Readers like you are the reason why we’re able to keep digging deep into stories you won’t find anywhere else. When you become a member, your support directly funds our journalism—from paying our reporters to keeping the internet on in our remote offices across the United States.

Your membership will also come with great benefits, including our award-winning newsletter, The Deep Dish, which is full of relevant and timely reporting, access to our members’ Slack community, and online salons as a way to engage with reporters, food and agriculture experts, and each other.

Civil Eats Supporting Membership $60/year $6/month
Give One, Get One Membership $100/year
Learn more about our membership program

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

More from

Food Policy Tracker

Featured

HARRINGTON, MAINE - AUGUST 08: Brandon Mott loads boxes of wild blueberries onto a truck as they harvest them from the plants in the fields of independent wild Maine blueberry grower Lynch Hill Farms on August 08, 2025 in Harrington, Maine. Independent wild Maine blueberry growers in the state are experiencing challenging times as their crops face several threats posed by climate change, from increased frequency of extreme weather events like droughts, floods, destructive frost, and warmer temperatures. Courtney Hammond, Lynch Hill Farms Manager, thinks his business is possibly in jeopardy as his crops are producing fewer marketable berries than normal. He, along with other independent growers, continues to try to adapt to the weather, but they could be reaching the point of no return, said Mr. Hammond. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

A Key Agriculture Census Doesn’t Reflect Reality, Researcher Warns

In a recent paper, University of Iowa professor Silvia Secchi finds that the current Census of Agriculture is neither complete nor accurate, and could skew federal research and investment.

Popular

House Republicans Block Tariff Challenges

The US Capitol building, where Congress meets. (Photo credit: Andrey Denisyuk, Getty Images)

Democrats Decry Corporate Consolidation ‘at Every Single Level’ of the Food System

the cereal aisle of the grocery store is full of ultraprocessed foods. (Photo credit: Katrina Wittkamp, Getty Images)

Specialty Crop Reps Push Congress for Farm Bill, Labor Reform

The US Capitol building, where Congress meets. (Photo credit: Andrey Denisyuk, Getty Images)

As Federal Support for On-Farm Solar Declines, Is Community Agrivoltaics the Future?

Chickens forage between the solar arrays at Jack's Solar Garden. (Photo credit: Jack's Solar Garden)