House Bill Would Halt Assessment of PFAS Risk on Farms | Civil Eats
A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

House Bill Would Halt Assessment of PFAS Risk on Farms

The bill also strengthens EPA authority around pesticide labeling, which could prevent states from adopting their own versions of labels.

July 17, 2025 Update: Representative Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) announced she’ll offer an amendment to strike the pesticide labeling provision during an upcoming full Appropriations Committee mark-up of the bill.

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

July 16, 2025 – In a draft appropriations bill that House Republicans moved forward this week, lawmakers included a provision that would halt the progress of an influential Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) assessment related to the risks of forever chemicals in farm soils.

Released by the Biden administration in mid-January, it was the first government report to find that the common practice of spreading sewage sludge on farms for fertilizer poses serious health risks for farmers and their neighbors due to the presence of the chemicals, which are collectively called PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). EPA officials found “human health risks exceeding the agency’s acceptable thresholds for cancer and non-cancer effects.” It had been published as a draft in order to accept public comments.

But the appropriations bill includes language that says no government funds “may be used to finalize, implement, administer, or enforce the draft risk assessment.”

“Preventing EPA from protecting public health and our food supply from toxic contamination epitomizes special interest politics at their worst,” said Kyla Bennet, the Science Policy Director for Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, in a press release. “If finalized, this ban will leave ill-equipped state agricultural agencies to deal with a rapidly spreading chemical disaster.”

banner showing a radar tracking screen and the words

In May, Trump’s EPA also rolled back limits on some PFAS in drinking water and canceled a collection of research projects that were part of a $15 million investment into understanding PFAS contamination on farms and in food.

The bill also includes language prohibiting funds from being used to change pesticide labeling in any way that conflicts with the EPA’s human health assessments. The pesticide industry has been lobbying lawmakers to strengthen the agency’s authority on pesticide labels as a way to prevent states from adopting labels that advise of different potential risks and to curb lawsuits, but it’s unclear exactly what impact this provision might have.

The bill will now be taken up by the full House Appropriations Committee and then go to Senate appropriators, who could make significant changes; if they do, then the House will need to re-vote on the updated bill.

In June, the House appropriations bill dedicated to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) funding took a similar tack to stop and reverse progress on a set of rules meant to protect farmers from meatpacker abuse. But when the Senate took up the bill this week, it removed that provision. Senators also restored Supplemental Nutrition Assistance for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) funding for fruits and vegetables, included funding for Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole Food for Education program, which Trump proposed eliminating, and largely maintained appropriations funding for USDA and FDA programs.

Congress has until October to finish the appropriations process and pass final bills. (Link to this post.)

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

Correction: This post has been updated to clarify that the bill will go to the full House Appropriations Committee next.

You’d be a great Civil Eats member…

Civil Eats is a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, and we count on our members to keep producing our award-winning work.

Readers like you are the reason why we’re able to keep digging deep into stories you won’t find anywhere else. When you become a member, your support directly funds our journalism—from paying our reporters to keeping the internet on in our remote offices across the United States.

Your membership will also come with great benefits, including our award-winning newsletter, The Deep Dish, which is full of relevant and timely reporting, access to our members’ Slack community, and online salons as a way to engage with reporters, food and agriculture experts, and each other.

Civil Eats Supporting Membership $60/year $6/month
Give One, Get One Membership $100/year
Learn more about our membership program

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

More from

Food Policy Tracker

Featured

HARRINGTON, MAINE - AUGUST 08: Brandon Mott loads boxes of wild blueberries onto a truck as they harvest them from the plants in the fields of independent wild Maine blueberry grower Lynch Hill Farms on August 08, 2025 in Harrington, Maine. Independent wild Maine blueberry growers in the state are experiencing challenging times as their crops face several threats posed by climate change, from increased frequency of extreme weather events like droughts, floods, destructive frost, and warmer temperatures. Courtney Hammond, Lynch Hill Farms Manager, thinks his business is possibly in jeopardy as his crops are producing fewer marketable berries than normal. He, along with other independent growers, continues to try to adapt to the weather, but they could be reaching the point of no return, said Mr. Hammond. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

A Key Agriculture Census Doesn’t Reflect Reality, Researcher Warns

In a recent paper, University of Iowa professor Silvia Secchi finds that the current Census of Agriculture is neither complete nor accurate, and could skew federal research and investment.

Popular

At Farm Aid, Top Agriculture Democrats Say Trump’s Policies Are Hurting Farmers

Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota) speaks on stage at Farm Aid 40 in Minnesota. (Photo credit: Lisa Held)

Rural Development Experts Warn Against USDA Cuts at Local Offices

The U.S. Department of Agriculture headquarters, with the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker logo superimposed. (Photo credit: Art Wagner, Getty Images)

House Republicans Block Tariff Challenges

The US Capitol building, where Congress meets. (Photo credit: Andrey Denisyuk, Getty Images)

Democrats Decry Corporate Consolidation ‘at Every Single Level’ of the Food System

the cereal aisle of the grocery store is full of ultraprocessed foods. (Photo credit: Katrina Wittkamp, Getty Images)